feat(delivery): production deploy over SSH/SFTP/FTP/FTPS (v2 phase A3-5)
The one path that touches a customer's server, and the one the platform cannot undo. It is human-triggered, confirmed and audited; there is deliberately no code path from a pipeline run into it (D13). - deploy_ssh.py: SshDeployer. Release lands in releases/<ts>-<sha7>/, the post-deploy command runs with cwd there, and only then does `current` move — atomically (relative symlink + mv -T). A failed hook or extraction never moves it, so the previous release keeps serving. Host key is pinned on first success (TOFU); a mismatch is a hard failure. Prunes to the newest five. - deploy_ftp.py: FtpDeployer. FTP has no atomic switch and no rollback except a backup, so a backup is mandatory: every file about to be overwritten is archived under ARTIFACTS_ROOT before anything is uploaded. The artifact is extracted, then the build dir (dist/build/public/out) is chosen — a static deploy must not publish the repository. Archive members are sanitised: absolute paths, `..` and escaping links are refused. - deploy_target.py: the tester that dispatches on `kind`. - deploy_service.py + production_deploys (migration a3b4c5d6e7f4) + 4 routes. One deploy per project at a time; the org slug must be typed back; the target summary reports has_secret, never the secret. Tests: 499 API (+26) with fake SSH/FTP transports; ruff, mypy, alembic clean. Report: docs/plan/reports/agent-3-phase-5.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession
|
||||
from app.application.container_delivery import (
|
||||
build_delivery_hooks,
|
||||
build_delivery_service,
|
||||
build_deploy_service,
|
||||
build_deploy_target_tester,
|
||||
build_repo_workspace,
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -168,6 +169,7 @@ __all__ = [
|
||||
"build_billing_service",
|
||||
"build_delivery_hooks",
|
||||
"build_delivery_service",
|
||||
"build_deploy_service",
|
||||
"build_deploy_target_tester",
|
||||
"build_memory",
|
||||
"build_model_grants",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user